dotrising.com
Compare
Galaxy S23 FE vs Hi Enjoy 60s

Samsung Galaxy S23 FE vs Wiko Hi Enjoy 60s

What Galaxy S23 FE does better (23) and where Hi Enjoy 60s wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Samsung · 2023Galaxy S23 FE

8.3Score

23 advantages≈ $220

Higher score

Wiko · 2023Hi Enjoy 60s

5.9Score

5 advantages≈ $220

7.7Display4.0

9.2Camera3.4

3.0Battery7.4

9.5Features5.0

Dimensions

Size comparison

Galaxy S23 FEHi Enjoy 60s

	Galaxy S23 FE	Hi Enjoy 60s	Difference
Height	158 mm	168.3 mm	−10.3 mm
Width	76.5 mm	77.7 mm	−1.2 mm
Thickness	8.2 mm	9 mm	−0.8 mm
Weight	209 g	199 g	+10 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Galaxy S23 FE better than Hi Enjoy 60s?

Main camera50 MP vs 13 MP3.8×
Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
OLED panelYes · Hi Enjoy 60s: No
Optical stabilisationYes · Hi Enjoy 60s: No
Telephoto cameraYes · Hi Enjoy 60s: No
Wireless chargingYes · Hi Enjoy 60s: No
NFCYes · Hi Enjoy 60s: No
Stereo speakersYes · Hi Enjoy 60s: No
Pixel density403 ppi vs 260 ppi+55%
Wired charging25 W vs 22 W+11%
Rear cameras3 vs 13×
CPU frequency3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+36%

Why is Hi Enjoy 60s better than Galaxy S23 FE?

Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+33%
Memory card slotNo · Galaxy S23 FE: Yes
3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Galaxy S23 FE: Yes
Screen size6.4″ vs 6.8″+5%
Weight209 g vs 199 g+5%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Samsung Galaxy S23 FE≈ $2208.3	Wiko Hi Enjoy 60s≈ $2205.9
Design
Weight	209 g	199 g
Thickness	8.2 mm	9 mm
Height	158 mm	168.3 mm
Width	76.5 mm	77.7 mm
Frame	Aluminium	—
Back	Glass	—
Ingress protection	IP68	—
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	—
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass 5	—
Colours	Mint, Cream, Graphite, Purple, Indigo, Tangerine	Black, Blue, White
Display
Screen size	6.4″	6.8″
Panel	Dynamic AMOLED 2X	TFT LCD
OLED panel	Yes	No
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	720 px
Resolution (height)	2,340 px	1,600 px
Pixel density	403 ppi	260 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	60 Hz
Peak brightness	1,450 nits	—
Measured brightness	985 nits	—
Screen-to-body ratio	83.2%	84.1%
HDR	Yes	—
Performance
Chipset	Exynos 2200 - International	Mediatek Dimensity 700
Chip maker	Qualcomm	MediaTek
Process	4 nm	7 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	3 GHz	2.2 GHz
GPU	Xclipse 920 - International Adreno 730 - USA	Mali-G57 MC2
AnTuTu score	940,921	—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	3,550	—
Memory
RAM	8 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 3.1	—
Memory card slot	No	Yes
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	13 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.8
Main sensor size	1/1.57"	—
Rear cameras	3	1
Optical stabilisation	Yes	No
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	No
Telephoto camera	Yes	No
Optical zoom	3×	—
Max video	8K	1080p
4K video frame rate	60 fps	—
Selfie camera	10 MP	8 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	No
Battery
Battery capacity	4,500 mAh	6,000 mAh
Battery type	Li-Ion	Li-Po
Active use (test)	8.5 h	—
Wired charging	25 W	22 W
Charged in 30 min	50%	—
Wireless charging	Yes	No
Wireless charging power	15 W	—
Reverse wireless charging	Yes	—
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6E	Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth	5.3	5.1
NFC	Yes	No
USB	USB Type-C 3.2	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	3.2	2
Video output	Yes	—
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	No
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	Yes
Loudspeaker loudness	-23.7 LUFS	—
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Side
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass
SAR (head)	0.76 W/kg	—
Software
OS at launch	Android 13	HarmonyOS 3.0
Platform	Android	HarmonyOS
Interface	One UI 8	—
Major OS updates promised	4	—