dotrising.com
Compare
Galaxy S22 Ultra vs Axon 40 Pro

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra vs ZTE Axon 40 Pro

What Galaxy S22 Ultra does better (15) and where Axon 40 Pro wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Samsung · 2022Galaxy S22 Ultra

9.3Score

15 advantages≈ $510

Higher score

ZTE · 2022Axon 40 Pro

8.6Score

5 advantages≈ $440

9.2Display8.4

9.8Camera7.9

7.1Battery6.9

9.4Features8.7

Dimensions

Size comparison

Galaxy S22 UltraAxon 40 Pro

	Galaxy S22 Ultra	Axon 40 Pro	Difference
Height	163.3 mm	162.9 mm	+0.4 mm
Width	77.9 mm	72.9 mm	+5 mm
Thickness	8.9 mm	8.7 mm	+0.2 mm
Weight	229 g	199 g	+30 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Galaxy S22 Ultra better than Axon 40 Pro?

Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
Optical stabilisationYes · Axon 40 Pro: No
Telephoto cameraYes · Axon 40 Pro: No
Wireless chargingYes · Axon 40 Pro: No
Peak brightness1,750 nits vs 1,000 nits+75%
Selfie camera40 MP vs 16 MP2.5×
Pixel density500 ppi vs 395 ppi+27%
Rear cameras4 vs 22×
Max video8K vs 4K
eSIMYes · Axon 40 Pro: No
Process4 nm vs 7 nm+75%
Resolution (width)1,440 px vs 1,080 px+33%

Why is Axon 40 Pro better than Galaxy S22 Ultra?

Wired charging45 W vs 65 W+44%
Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
Weight229 g vs 199 g+15%
CPU frequency2.8 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+14%
Thickness8.9 mm vs 8.7 mm+2%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra≈ $5109.3	ZTE Axon 40 Pro≈ $4408.6
Design
Weight	229 g	199 g
Thickness	8.9 mm	8.7 mm
Height	163.3 mm	162.9 mm
Width	77.9 mm	72.9 mm
Frame	Aluminium	—
Back	Glass	—
Ingress protection	IP68	—
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	—
Glass protection	Gorilla Glass Victus	—
Colours	White, Black, Gray, Blue, Green, Red	Dream black, Crystal blue, Gold
Stylus	Yes	—
Display
Screen size	6.8″	6.7″
Panel	Dynamic Amoled 2X	AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,440 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	3,080 px	2,400 px
Pixel density	500 ppi	395 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	144 Hz
Peak brightness	1,750 nits	1,000 nits
Measured brightness	1,253 nits	—
Screen-to-body ratio	89.8%	90.4%
HDR	Yes	—
Performance
Chipset	Samsung Exynos 2200	Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G
Chip maker	Samsung	Qualcomm
Process	4 nm	7 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.8 GHz	3.2 GHz
GPU	Xclipse 920	Adreno 650
AnTuTu score	1,434,169	—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	4,351	—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	1,967	—
Memory
RAM	12 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	1,024 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 3.1	UFS 3.1
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	108 MP	108 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.9
Main sensor size	1/1.33"	1/1.52"
Rear cameras	4	2
Optical stabilisation	Yes	No
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	Yes	No
Optical zoom	10×	—
Max video	8K	4K
4K video frame rate	60 fps	60 fps
Selfie camera	40 MP	16 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	5,000 mAh	5,000 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Wired charging	45 W	65 W
Charged in 30 min	60%	—
Wireless charging	Yes	No
Wireless charging power	15 W	—
Reverse wireless charging	Yes	—
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6E	Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth	5.2	5.2
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C	USB Type-C 3.1
USB version	3.2	3.1
Video output	Yes	—
Ultra Wideband	Yes	—
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display
Barometer	Yes	—
Sensors	proximity, accelerometer, gyro, light, compass, barometer, hall, fingerprint	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)	1.05 W/kg	—
Software
OS at launch	Android 12	Android 12
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	One UI 4.1	MyOS 12