- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Galaxy S22 Ultra vs Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
What Galaxy S22 Ultra does better (4) and where Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra wins (20) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.2Display8.7
7.8Performance9.1
9.8Camera9.5
7.1Battery7.8
9.4Features9.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy S22 UltraGalaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
| Galaxy S22 Ultra | Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.3 mm | 158.4 mm | +4.9 mm |
| Width | 77.9 mm | 143.2 mm | −65.3 mm |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 4.1 mm | +4.8 mm |
| Weight | 229 g | 215 g | +14 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy S22 Ultra better than Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?
- Optical zoom10× vs 3×3.3×
- Selfie camera40 MP vs 10 MP4×
- Pixel density500 ppi vs 422 ppi+18%
- Rear cameras4 vs 3+33%
Why is Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra better than Galaxy S22 Ultra?
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,351 vs 11,1242.6×
- AnTuTu score1,434,169 vs 2,160,310+51%
- Main camera108 MP vs 200 MP+85%
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme1,967 vs 6,7723.4×
- RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
- Peak brightness1,750 nits vs 3,000 nits+71%
- CPU frequency2.8 GHz vs 4.74 GHz+69%
- Thickness8.9 mm vs 4.1 mm2.2×
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 120 fps2×
- Screen size6.8″ vs 8″+18%
- Measured brightness1,253 nits vs 1,432 nits+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 229 g | 215 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 4.1 mm |
| Height | 163.3 mm | 158.4 mm |
| Width | 77.9 mm | 143.2 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP48 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Gorilla Glass Victus | Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Colours | White, Black, Gray, Blue, Green, Red | Graphite, Cream, Violet Shadow |
| Stylus | Yes | Yes |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 8″ |
| Panel | Dynamic Amoled 2X | Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,440 px | 2,256 px |
| Resolution (height) | 3,080 px | 2,504 px |
| Pixel density | 500 ppi | 422 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,750 nits | 3,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,253 nits | 1,432 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.8% | 90.1% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Foldable | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 2200 | Qualcomm SM8850-1-AD Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| Chip maker | Samsung | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.8 GHz | 4.74 GHz |
| GPU | Xclipse 920 | Adreno 840 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,434,169 | 2,160,310 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 4,351 | 11,124 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,967 | 6,772 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4. |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 200 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.33" | 1/1.3" |
| Rear cameras | 4 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 10× | 3× |
| Max video | 8K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 120 fps |
| Selfie camera | 40 MP | 10 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Si/C |
| Active use (test) | — | 13.1 h |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 60% | 67% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | 20 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 6 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Video output | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra Wideband | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -29.3 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, light, compass, barometer, hall, fingerprint | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| SAR (head) | 1.05 W/kg | 0.82 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 17 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 4.1 | One UI 9 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 7 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | A |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,200 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 51 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | A |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy S23 UltravsSamsung Galaxy S22 Ultra
9.29.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5GvsSamsung Galaxy S22 Ultra
9.09.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy S22 UltravsSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G
9.39.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy S22 UltravsZTE nubia Z40S Pro
9.39.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy S22 UltravsTel.Me. T909
vs
Samsung Galaxy S22 UltravsTel.Me. T909c