- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Galaxy M62 vs S9
Samsung Galaxy M62 vs Vivo S9
What Galaxy M62 does better (5) and where S9 wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.2Display7.1
7.5Camera8.7
8.0Battery3.2
5.0Features7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy M62S9
| Galaxy M62 | S9 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.9 mm | 158.4 mm | +5.5 mm |
| Width | 76.3 mm | 73.9 mm | +2.4 mm |
| Thickness | 9.5 mm | 7.4 mm | +2.1 mm |
| Weight | 218 g | 173 g | +45 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy M62 better than S9?
- Battery capacity7,000 mAh vs 4,000 mAh+75%
- Memory card slotYes · S9: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · S9: No
- CPU frequency2.73 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+5%
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.4″+4%
Why is S9 better than Galaxy M62?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 90 Hz+50%
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Optical stabilisationNo · Galaxy M62: Yes
- 5GNo · Galaxy M62: Yes
- Wired charging25 W vs 33 W+32%
- Weight218 g vs 173 g+26%
- Pixel density393 ppi vs 409 ppi+4%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 44 MP+38%
- Thickness9.5 mm vs 7.4 mm+28%
- Process7 nm vs 6 nm+17%
- Bluetooth5 vs 5.2+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 218 g | 173 g |
| Thickness | 9.5 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 163.9 mm | 158.4 mm |
| Width | 76.3 mm | 73.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Colours | Laser Green, Laser Gray, Laser Blue | Black, White, Gradient Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.4″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 409 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 420 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.7% | 85.5% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Exynos 9825 | Mediatek Dimensity 1100 |
| Chip maker | Exynos | MediaTek |
| Process | 7 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.73 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP12 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.73" | 1/1.72" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 44 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,000 mAh | 4,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 66% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.68 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 5 | OriginOS 1.0 |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Poco F3vsSamsung Galaxy M62
7.47.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy M62vsXiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G
7.27.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy M62vsRealme GT Master
7.27.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy M62vsXiaomi Poco X3 GT
7.27.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy M62vsXiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro Max
7.27.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy M62vsOPPO Reno6 5G
7.27.1