- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Galaxy M62 vs iQOO Neo5 Lite
Samsung Galaxy M62 vs Vivo iQOO Neo5 Lite
What Galaxy M62 does better (7) and where iQOO Neo5 Lite wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.2Display7.3
7.5Camera6.5
8.0Battery4.8
5.0Features7.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy M62iQOO Neo5 Lite
| Galaxy M62 | iQOO Neo5 Lite | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.9 mm | 164 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Width | 76.3 mm | 75.5 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Thickness | 9.5 mm | 8.9 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Weight | 218 g | 198 g | +20 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy M62 better than iQOO Neo5 Lite?
- Battery capacity7,000 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+56%
- OLED panelYes · iQOO Neo5 Lite: No
- Main camera64 MP vs 48 MP+33%
- Memory card slotYes · iQOO Neo5 Lite: No
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
- 4K selfie videoYes · iQOO Neo5 Lite: No
- Screen-to-body ratio86.7% vs 84%+3%
Why is iQOO Neo5 Lite better than Galaxy M62?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 144 Hz2.4×
- Wired charging25 W vs 44 W+76%
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- 5GNo · Galaxy M62: Yes
- CPU frequency2.73 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+17%
- Weight218 g vs 198 g+10%
- Pixel density393 ppi vs 402 ppi+2%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
- Thickness9.5 mm vs 8.9 mm+7%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 218 g | 198 g |
| Thickness | 9.5 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 163.9 mm | 164 mm |
| Width | 76.3 mm | 75.5 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Colours | Laser Green, Laser Gray, Laser Blue | Black, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,408 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 402 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 420 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.7% | 84% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Exynos 9825 | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G |
| Chip maker | Exynos | Qualcomm |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.73 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP12 | Adreno 650 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.73" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,000 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 44 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 64% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.68 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 5 | OriginOS 1.0 |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Poco F3vsSamsung Galaxy M62
7.47.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy M62vsXiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G
7.27.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy M62vsRealme GT Master
7.27.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy M62vsXiaomi Poco X3 GT
7.27.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy M62vsXiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro Max
7.27.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy M62vsOPPO Reno6 5G
7.27.1


