- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Galaxy M62 vs Aquos zero6
Samsung Galaxy M62 vs Sharp Aquos zero6
What Galaxy M62 does better (9) and where Aquos zero6 wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.2Display9.0
7.5Camera6.3
8.0Battery2.8
5.0Features7.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy M62Aquos zero6
| Galaxy M62 | Aquos zero6 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.9 mm | 158 mm | +5.9 mm |
| Width | 76.3 mm | 73 mm | +3.3 mm |
| Thickness | 9.5 mm | 7.9 mm | +1.6 mm |
| Weight | 218 g | 146 g | +72 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy M62 better than Aquos zero6?
- Battery capacity7,000 mAh vs 4,010 mAh+75%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Main camera64 MP vs 48 MP+33%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 13 MP2.5×
- CPU frequency2.73 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+24%
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- 4K selfie videoYes · Aquos zero6: No
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.4″+5%
- Process7 nm vs 8 nm+14%
Why is Aquos zero6 better than Galaxy M62?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 240 Hz4×
- Telephoto cameraNo · Galaxy M62: Yes
- 5GNo · Galaxy M62: Yes
- Weight218 g vs 146 g+49%
- eSIMNo · Galaxy M62: Yes
- Pixel density393 ppi vs 403 ppi+3%
- Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
- Thickness9.5 mm vs 7.9 mm+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 218 g | 146 g |
| Thickness | 9.5 mm | 7.9 mm |
| Height | 163.9 mm | 158 mm |
| Width | 76.3 mm | 73 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | — | IP6X |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx5 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Colours | Laser Green, Laser Gray, Laser Blue | Swan Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.4″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 403 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 420 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.7% | 87.2% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Exynos 9825 | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G |
| Chip maker | Exynos | Qualcomm |
| Process | 7 nm | 8 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.73 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP12 | Adreno 619 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.73" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 2× |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,000 mAh | 4,010 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 25 W | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer |
| SAR (head) | 0.68 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 5 | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Poco F3vsSamsung Galaxy M62
7.47.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy M62vsXiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G
7.27.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy M62vsRealme GT Master
7.27.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy M62vsXiaomi Poco X3 GT
7.27.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy M62vsXiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro Max
7.27.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy M62vsOPPO Reno6 5G
7.27.1


