- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Galaxy M54 vs Armor 22
Samsung Galaxy M54 vs UleFone Armor 22
What Galaxy M54 does better (14) and where Armor 22 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.6Display6.7
8.8Camera5.4
7.5Battery8.2
7.9Features7.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy M54Armor 22
| Galaxy M54 | Armor 22 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.9 mm | 176.8 mm | −11.9 mm |
| Width | 77.3 mm | 84.9 mm | −7.6 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 15 mm | −6.6 mm |
| Weight | 199 g | 324 g | −125 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy M54 better than Armor 22?
- Main camera108 MP vs 64 MP+69%
- OLED panelYes · Armor 22: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · Armor 22: No
- Weight199 g vs 324 g+63%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 8 MP4×
- Process5 nm vs 12 nm2.4×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Armor 22: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- 4K selfie videoYes · Armor 22: No
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.05 GHz+17%
- Thickness8.4 mm vs 15 mm+79%
- Screen-to-body ratio85% vs 69.5%+22%
Why is Armor 22 better than Galaxy M54?
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 6,600 mAh+10%
- Wired charging25 W vs 33 W+32%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Galaxy M54: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 199 g | 324 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 15 mm |
| Height | 164.9 mm | 176.8 mm |
| Width | 77.3 mm | 84.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Dark Blue, Silver | Black, Black/Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,408 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 401 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85% | 69.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Exynos 1380 | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 |
| Chip maker | Exynos | MediaTek |
| Process | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.05 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 756,067 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,895 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 799 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | 1/1.7" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 6,600 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 32% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass, gyro, barometer |
| SAR (head) | 0.49 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | A |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 73 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | A |
