- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Galaxy M52 5G vs S30
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G vs ZTE S30
What Galaxy M52 5G does better (12) and where S30 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.8Display5.5
7.5Camera7.2
5.3Battery3.0
7.9Features5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy M52 5GS30
| Galaxy M52 5G | S30 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.2 mm | 164.8 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 76.4 mm | = |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 7.9 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Weight | 173 g | 184 g | −11 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy M52 5G better than S30?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,000 mAh+25%
- OLED panelYes · S30: No
- NFCYes · S30: No
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 90 Hz+33%
- Memory card slotYes · S30: No
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
- 4K selfie videoYes · S30: No
- Weight173 g vs 184 g+6%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.3 GHz+4%
- Process6 nm vs 8 nm+33%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
- Thickness7.4 mm vs 7.9 mm+7%
Why is S30 better than Galaxy M52 5G?
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Wired charging25 W vs 30 W+20%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Galaxy M52 5G: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 173 g | 184 g |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 7.9 mm |
| Height | 164.2 mm | 164.8 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 76.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Icy Blue, Blazing Black, White | Black, Pink/Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 400 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 777 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.4% | 85.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 8 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 618 |
| AnTuTu score | 504,424 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,796 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 679 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.97" | 1/1.72" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 30 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 30% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -30 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.79 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 5.1 | MyOS 11 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy M33vsSamsung Galaxy M52 5G
6.77.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy M53vsSamsung Galaxy M52 5G
7.47.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy M52 5GvsSamsung Galaxy M31
7.36.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy M13vsSamsung Galaxy M52 5G
4.87.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy M23vsSamsung Galaxy M52 5G
6.57.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy M52 5GvsSamsung Galaxy M51
7.36.7