- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Galaxy M52 5G vs iQOO Neo5 Lite
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G vs Vivo iQOO Neo5 Lite
What Galaxy M52 5G does better (10) and where iQOO Neo5 Lite wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.8Display7.3
7.5Camera6.5
5.3Battery4.8
7.9Features7.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy M52 5GiQOO Neo5 Lite
| Galaxy M52 5G | iQOO Neo5 Lite | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.2 mm | 164 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 75.5 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 8.9 mm | −1.5 mm |
| Weight | 173 g | 198 g | −25 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy M52 5G better than iQOO Neo5 Lite?
- OLED panelYes · iQOO Neo5 Lite: No
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+11%
- Main camera64 MP vs 48 MP+33%
- Memory card slotYes · iQOO Neo5 Lite: No
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
- 4K selfie videoYes · iQOO Neo5 Lite: No
- Weight173 g vs 198 g+15%
- Thickness7.4 mm vs 8.9 mm+20%
- Process6 nm vs 7 nm+17%
- Screen-to-body ratio86.4% vs 84%+3%
Why is iQOO Neo5 Lite better than Galaxy M52 5G?
- Wired charging25 W vs 44 W+76%
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+33%
- Charged in 30 min30% vs 64%2.1×
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Galaxy M52 5G: Yes
- Pixel density393 ppi vs 402 ppi+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 173 g | 198 g |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 164.2 mm | 164 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 75.5 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Icy Blue, Blazing Black, White | Black, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,408 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 402 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 400 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 777 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.4% | 84% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 650 |
| AnTuTu score | 504,424 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,796 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 679 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.97" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 44 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 30% | 64% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -30 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.79 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 5.1 | OriginOS 1.0 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy M33vsSamsung Galaxy M52 5G
6.77.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy M53vsSamsung Galaxy M52 5G
7.47.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy M52 5GvsSamsung Galaxy M31
7.36.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy M13vsSamsung Galaxy M52 5G
4.87.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy M23vsSamsung Galaxy M52 5G
6.57.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy M52 5GvsSamsung Galaxy M51
7.36.7


