- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Galaxy M52 5G vs Pova 5G
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G vs Tecno Pova 5G
What Galaxy M52 5G does better (8) and where Pova 5G wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.8Display7.2
7.5Camera6.1
5.3Battery7.0
7.9Features6.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy M52 5GPova 5G
| Galaxy M52 5G | Pova 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.2 mm | 172.8 mm | −8.6 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 78.2 mm | −1.8 mm |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 9.1 mm | −1.7 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy M52 5G better than Pova 5G?
- OLED panelYes · Pova 5G: No
- Wired charging25 W vs 18 W+39%
- Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Pova 5G: No
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 4+50%
- Thickness7.4 mm vs 9.1 mm+23%
- Screen-to-body ratio86.4% vs 83.7%+3%
Why is Pova 5G better than Galaxy M52 5G?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+20%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Galaxy M52 5G: Yes
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.9″+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 173 g | — |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 9.1 mm |
| Height | 164.2 mm | 172.8 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 78.2 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Icy Blue, Blazing Black, White | Aether Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 389 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 400 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 777 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.4% | 83.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G | Mediatek Dimensity 900 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| AnTuTu score | 504,424 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,796 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 679 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.97" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 30% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | — |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | Yes |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -30 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer proximity |
| SAR (head) | 0.79 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 5.1 | HiOS 8.0 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy M33vsSamsung Galaxy M52 5G
6.77.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy M53vsSamsung Galaxy M52 5G
7.47.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy M52 5GvsSamsung Galaxy M31
7.36.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy M13vsSamsung Galaxy M52 5G
4.87.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy M23vsSamsung Galaxy M52 5G
6.57.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy M52 5GvsSamsung Galaxy M51
7.36.7