dotrising.com
Compare
Galaxy M52 5G vs Camon 17 Pro

Samsung Galaxy M52 5G vs Tecno Camon 17 Pro

What Galaxy M52 5G does better (14) and where Camon 17 Pro wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Samsung · 2021Galaxy M52 5G

7.3Score

14 advantages≈ $320

Higher score

Tecno · 2021Camon 17 Pro

5.7Score

7 advantages≈ $300

6.8Display5.4

4.7Performance2.9

7.5Camera7.6

5.3Battery6.0

7.9Features3.5

Dimensions

Size comparison

Galaxy M52 5GCamon 17 Pro

	Galaxy M52 5G	Camon 17 Pro	Difference
Height	164.2 mm	168.9 mm	−4.7 mm
Width	76.4 mm	77 mm	−0.6 mm
Thickness	7.4 mm	9 mm	−1.6 mm
Weight	173 g	201 g	−28 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Galaxy M52 5G better than Camon 17 Pro?

AnTuTu score504,424 vs 309,107+63%
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,796 vs 1,668+68%
OLED panelYes · Camon 17 Pro: No
5GYes · Camon 17 Pro: No
NFCYes · Camon 17 Pro: No
Refresh rate120 Hz vs 90 Hz+33%
Measured brightness777 nits vs 538 nits+44%
Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
4K selfie videoYes · Camon 17 Pro: No
CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.05 GHz+17%
Weight173 g vs 201 g+16%
Thickness7.4 mm vs 9 mm+22%

Why is Camon 17 Pro better than Galaxy M52 5G?

Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
Wired charging25 W vs 33 W+32%
Peak brightness400 nits vs 500 nits+25%
3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Galaxy M52 5G: Yes
Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
Selfie camera32 MP vs 48 MP+50%
Loudspeaker loudness-30 LUFS vs -24.4 LUFS+-19%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Samsung Galaxy M52 5G≈ $3207.3	Tecno Camon 17 Pro≈ $3005.7
Design
Weight	173 g	201 g
Thickness	7.4 mm	9 mm
Height	164.2 mm	168.9 mm
Width	76.4 mm	77 mm
Frame	Plastic	—
Back	Plastic	—
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass 5	—
Colours	Icy Blue, Blazing Black, White	California Silver, Malibu Blue
Display
Screen size	6.7″	6.8″
Panel	Super AMOLED Plus	IPS LCD
OLED panel	Yes	No
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,400 px	2,460 px
Pixel density	393 ppi	395 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	90 Hz
Peak brightness	400 nits	500 nits
Measured brightness	777 nits	538 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	86.4%	84.4%
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G	Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95
Chip maker	Qualcomm	MediaTek
Process	6 nm	12 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.4 GHz	2.05 GHz
GPU	Adreno 642L	Mali-G76 MC4
AnTuTu score	504,424	309,107
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	2,796	1,668
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	679	—
Memory
RAM	8 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	128 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 2.1	—
Memory card slot	Yes	Yes
Camera
Main camera	64 MP	64 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.8
Main sensor size	1/1.97"	1/1.72"
Rear cameras	2	3
Optical stabilisation	No	No
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	4K	4K
4K video frame rate	30 fps	30 fps
Selfie camera	32 MP	48 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	No
Battery
Battery capacity	5,000 mAh	5,000 mAh
Battery type	Li-Ion	—
Wired charging	25 W	33 W
Charged in 30 min	30%	—
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
5G	Yes	No
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth	5	5
NFC	Yes	No
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	—
Features
Stereo speakers	No	No
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	Yes
Loudspeaker loudness	-30 LUFS	-24.4 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Side
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)	0.79 W/kg	—
Software
OS at launch	Android 11	Android 11
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	One UI 5.1	HiOS 7.6