- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Galaxy M52 5G vs Galaxy M62
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G vs Samsung Galaxy M62
What Galaxy M52 5G does better (6) and where Galaxy M62 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.8Display5.2
7.5Camera7.5
5.3Battery8.0
7.9Features5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy M52 5GGalaxy M62
| Galaxy M52 5G | Galaxy M62 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.2 mm | 163.9 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 76.3 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 9.5 mm | −2.1 mm |
| Weight | 173 g | 218 g | −45 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy M52 5G better than Galaxy M62?
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
- 5GYes · Galaxy M62: No
- Weight173 g vs 218 g+26%
- Thickness7.4 mm vs 9.5 mm+28%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
- Process6 nm vs 7 nm+17%
Why is Galaxy M62 better than Galaxy M52 5G?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 7,000 mAh+40%
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Galaxy M52 5G: Yes
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.73 GHz+14%
- Peak brightness400 nits vs 420 nits+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 173 g | 218 g |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 9.5 mm |
| Height | 164.2 mm | 163.9 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 76.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Icy Blue, Blazing Black, White | Laser Green, Laser Gray, Laser Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED Plus |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 400 nits | 420 nits |
| Measured brightness | 777 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.4% | 86.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G | Exynos 9825 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Exynos |
| Process | 6 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.73 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Mali-G76 MP12 |
| AnTuTu score | 504,424 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,796 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 679 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.97" | 1/1.73" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 7,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 30% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -30 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.79 W/kg | 0.68 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 5.1 | One UI 5 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy M33vsSamsung Galaxy M52 5G
6.77.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy M53vsSamsung Galaxy M52 5G
7.47.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy M52 5GvsSamsung Galaxy M31
7.36.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy M13vsSamsung Galaxy M52 5G
4.87.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy M23vsSamsung Galaxy M52 5G
6.57.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy M52 5GvsSamsung Galaxy M51
7.36.7