- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Galaxy M42 5G vs Blade V30
Samsung Galaxy M42 5G vs ZTE Blade V30
What Galaxy M42 5G does better (9) and where Blade V30 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.5Display4.6
6.7Camera6.9
4.0Battery4.6
7.1Features3.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy M42 5GBlade V30
| Galaxy M42 5G | Blade V30 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.4 mm | 165.8 mm | −1.4 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 77.8 mm | −1.9 mm |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 8.9 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Weight | 190 g | 193 g | −3 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy M42 5G better than Blade V30?
- RAM8 GB vs 4 GB2×
- OLED panelYes · Blade V30: No
- 5GYes · Blade V30: No
- NFCYes · Blade V30: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz+10%
- Process8 nm vs 12 nm+50%
- Selfie camera20 MP vs 16 MP+25%
- Thickness8.6 mm vs 8.9 mm+3%
Why is Blade V30 better than Galaxy M42 5G?
- Main camera48 MP vs 64 MP+33%
- Wired charging15 W vs 18 W+20%
- Pixel density266 ppi vs 395 ppi+48%
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 190 g | 193 g |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 164.4 mm | 165.8 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 77.8 mm |
| Colours | Prism Dot Black, Prism Dot Gray | Black, Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 266 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.3% | 83.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G | Unisoc Tiger T618 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Unisoc |
| Process | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali G52 MP2 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 20 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 18 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| SAR (head) | 0.69 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 5.1 | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProvsSamsung Galaxy M42 5G
6.96.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy M42 5GvsXiaomi Poco X3 Pro
6.66.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy M42 5GvsOnePlus Nord CE 5G
6.66.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy M42 5GvsSamsung Galaxy M31
6.66.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy M42 5GvsSamsung Galaxy M51
6.66.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy M42 5GvsXiaomi Redmi Note 11T 5G
6.66.5