- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Galaxy M42 5G vs Bison X10
Samsung Galaxy M42 5G vs Umidigi Bison X10
What Galaxy M42 5G does better (13) and where Bison X10 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.5Display3.5
6.7Camera5.2
4.0Battery6.4
7.1Features7.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy M42 5GBison X10
| Galaxy M42 5G | Bison X10 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.4 mm | 169.7 mm | −5.3 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 82.1 mm | −6.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 12.9 mm | −4.3 mm |
| Weight | 190 g | 282 g | −92 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy M42 5G better than Bison X10?
- Main camera48 MP vs 20 MP2.4×
- RAM8 GB vs 4 GB2×
- Wired charging15 W vs 10 W+50%
- OLED panelYes · Bison X10: No
- Weight190 g vs 282 g+48%
- Selfie camera20 MP vs 8 MP2.5×
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz+10%
- Thickness8.6 mm vs 12.9 mm+50%
- Process8 nm vs 12 nm+50%
- Bluetooth5 vs 4.2+19%
Why is Bison X10 better than Galaxy M42 5G?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,150 mAh+23%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 190 g | 282 g |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 12.9 mm |
| Height | 164.4 mm | 169.7 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 82.1 mm |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Colours | Prism Dot Black, Prism Dot Gray | Storm Gray, Supersonic Yellow, Hack Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 266 ppi | 269 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.3% | 73.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G | Mediatek Helio P60 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 20 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 20 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,150 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 10 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 4.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometer |
| SAR (head) | 0.69 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 5.1 | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProvsSamsung Galaxy M42 5G
6.96.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy M42 5GvsXiaomi Poco X3 Pro
6.66.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy M42 5GvsOnePlus Nord CE 5G
6.66.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy M42 5GvsSamsung Galaxy M31
6.66.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy M42 5GvsSamsung Galaxy M51
6.66.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy M42 5GvsXiaomi Redmi Note 11T 5G
6.66.5