- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Galaxy M42 5G vs Armor 8 Pro
Samsung Galaxy M42 5G vs UleFone Armor 8 Pro
What Galaxy M42 5G does better (15) and where Armor 8 Pro wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.5Display3.0
6.7Camera3.7
4.0Battery6.3
7.1Features6.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy M42 5GArmor 8 Pro
| Galaxy M42 5G | Armor 8 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.4 mm | 166 mm | −1.6 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 81.8 mm | −5.9 mm |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 15 mm | −6.4 mm |
| Weight | 190 g | 282 g | −92 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy M42 5G better than Armor 8 Pro?
- Main camera48 MP vs 16 MP3×
- OLED panelYes · Armor 8 Pro: No
- 5GYes · Armor 8 Pro: No
- Weight190 g vs 282 g+48%
- Selfie camera20 MP vs 8 MP2.5×
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Armor 8 Pro: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz+10%
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.1″+8%
- Thickness8.6 mm vs 15 mm+74%
- Process8 nm vs 12 nm+50%
Why is Armor 8 Pro better than Galaxy M42 5G?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 5,580 mAh+12%
- Pixel density266 ppi vs 282 ppi+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 190 g | 282 g |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 15 mm |
| Height | 164.4 mm | 166 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 81.8 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Aluminium |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Scratch-resistant glass, oleophobic coating |
| Colours | Prism Dot Black, Prism Dot Gray | Black, Orange, Red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.1″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 1,560 px |
| Pixel density | 266 ppi | 282 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.3% | 67.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G | Mediatek MT6771 Helio P60 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 16 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.2 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 20 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,580 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 15 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 4.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.69 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 5.1 | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProvsSamsung Galaxy M42 5G
6.96.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy M42 5GvsXiaomi Poco X3 Pro
6.76.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy M42 5GvsSamsung Galaxy M31
6.76.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy M42 5GvsSamsung Galaxy M51
6.76.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy M42 5GvsXiaomi Redmi Note 11T 5G
6.76.5
vs
Samsung Galaxy M42 5GvsOPPO A95 5G
6.76.6