- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Galaxy F70 Pro vs Z-Pro Max
Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro vs ZEED Z-Pro Max
What Galaxy F70 Pro does better (9) and where Z-Pro Max wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.2Display7.4
8.0Camera5.8
8.2Battery8.1
7.0Features8.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy F70 ProZ-Pro Max
| Galaxy F70 Pro | Z-Pro Max | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.4 mm | 169.4 mm | −7 mm |
| Width | 78.2 mm | 80.5 mm | −2.3 mm |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 8.2 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Weight | 206 g | 221 g | −15 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy F70 Pro better than Z-Pro Max?
- OLED panelYes · Z-Pro Max: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · Z-Pro Max: No
- Peak brightness1,400 nits vs 800 nits+75%
- Wired charging45 W vs 40 W+12%
- Main camera50 MP vs 48 MP+4%
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- Weight206 g vs 221 g+7%
- Pixel density385 ppi vs 374 ppi+3%
- Process4 nm vs 6 nm+50%
Why is Z-Pro Max better than Galaxy F70 Pro?
- Stereo speakersNo · Galaxy F70 Pro: Yes
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Galaxy F70 Pro: Yes
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.9″+3%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
- Selfie camera12 MP vs 13 MP+8%
- Bluetooth5.1 vs 5.4+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 206 g | 221 g |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 162.4 mm | 169.4 mm |
| Width | 78.2 mm | 80.5 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP65 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx5 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Oleophobic coating |
| Colours | Aurora Green, Alpha Black | Orange, Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | 374 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,400 nits | 800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.8% | 85.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 | Mediatek Dimensity 7100 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Mali-G610 MC2 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 12 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 40 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.5 W/kg | 1.44 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8.5 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 6 | — |
