- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Galaxy F23 vs T2x
Samsung Galaxy F23 vs Vivo T2x
What Galaxy F23 does better (5) and where T2x wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.8Display7.0
6.4Camera6.1
5.3Battery8.2
7.1Features7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy F23T2x
| Galaxy F23 | T2x | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 165.5 mm | 163.9 mm | +1.6 mm |
| Width | 77 mm | 75.3 mm | +1.7 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 9.2 mm | −0.8 mm |
| Weight | 198 g | 203 g | −5 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy F23 better than T2x?
- Memory card slotYes · T2x: No
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · T2x: No
- Weight198 g vs 203 g+2%
- Thickness8.4 mm vs 9.2 mm+10%
Why is T2x better than Galaxy F23?
- Wired charging25 W vs 44 W+76%
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+20%
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 3 GHz+36%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 16 MP2×
- Process8 nm vs 6 nm+33%
- Bluetooth5 vs 5.2+4%
- Screen-to-body ratio82.3% vs 84.5%+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 198 g | 203 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 9.2 mm |
| Height | 165.5 mm | 163.9 mm |
| Width | 77 mm | 75.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Aqua Blue, Forest Green | Black, Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,408 px | 2,408 px |
| Pixel density | 400 ppi | 401 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 650 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.3% | 84.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G | Mediatek Dimensity 1300 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 44 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 1.24 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 6 | OriginOS 2.0 |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GvsSamsung Galaxy F23
7.27.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy A33 5GvsSamsung Galaxy F23
7.17.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy F54vsSamsung Galaxy F23
8.87.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy F14vsSamsung Galaxy F23
6.77.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy F23vsOPPO Reno7 5G
7.17.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy F34vsSamsung Galaxy F23
8.27.1