- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Galaxy F23 vs iQOO Z6 Lite
Samsung Galaxy F23 vs Vivo iQOO Z6 Lite
What Galaxy F23 does better (7) and where iQOO Z6 Lite wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.8Display6.7
6.4Camera4.6
5.3Battery4.6
7.1Features5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy F23iQOO Z6 Lite
| Galaxy F23 | iQOO Z6 Lite | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 165.5 mm | 164 mm | +1.5 mm |
| Width | 77 mm | 75.8 mm | +1.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.3 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 198 g | 194 g | +4 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy F23 better than iQOO Z6 Lite?
- NFCYes · iQOO Z6 Lite: No
- Wired charging25 W vs 18 W+39%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · iQOO Z6 Lite: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz+10%
Why is iQOO Z6 Lite better than Galaxy F23?
- Weight198 g vs 194 g+2%
- Process8 nm vs 6 nm+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 198 g | 194 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Height | 165.5 mm | 164 mm |
| Width | 77 mm | 75.8 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Aqua Blue, Forest Green | Mystic Night, Stellar Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,408 px | 2,408 px |
| Pixel density | 400 ppi | 401 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.3% | 83.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G | Qualcomm SM4375 Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 18 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 1.24 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 6 | Funtouch 12 |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GvsSamsung Galaxy F23
7.27.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy A33 5GvsSamsung Galaxy F23
7.17.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy F54vsSamsung Galaxy F23
8.87.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy F14vsSamsung Galaxy F23
6.77.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy F23vsOPPO Reno7 5G
7.17.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy F34vsSamsung Galaxy F23
8.27.1