- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Galaxy F23 vs Bison 2
Samsung Galaxy F23 vs Umidigi Bison 2
What Galaxy F23 does better (9) and where Bison 2 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.8Display4.3
6.4Camera6.3
5.3Battery7.3
7.1Features7.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy F23Bison 2
| Galaxy F23 | Bison 2 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 165.5 mm | 172.1 mm | −6.6 mm |
| Width | 77 mm | 83.8 mm | −6.8 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 12.9 mm | −4.5 mm |
| Weight | 198 g | 280 g | −82 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy F23 better than Bison 2?
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
- Wired charging25 W vs 18 W+39%
- Weight198 g vs 280 g+41%
- Main camera50 MP vs 48 MP+4%
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- Thickness8.4 mm vs 12.9 mm+54%
- Process8 nm vs 12 nm+50%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/2.2+22%
- Screen-to-body ratio82.3% vs 70.7%+16%
Why is Bison 2 better than Galaxy F23?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,150 mAh+23%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 24 MP3×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 198 g | 280 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 12.9 mm |
| Height | 165.5 mm | 172.1 mm |
| Width | 77 mm | 83.8 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Aqua Blue, Forest Green | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,408 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 400 ppi | 405 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.3% | 70.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G | Mediatek Helio P90 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | PowerVR GM9446 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.2 |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 24 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,150 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 18 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometer, thermometer (skin temperature) |
| SAR (head) | 1.24 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 6 | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GvsSamsung Galaxy F23
7.27.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy A33 5GvsSamsung Galaxy F23
7.17.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy F54vsSamsung Galaxy F23
8.87.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy F14vsSamsung Galaxy F23
6.77.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy F23vsOPPO Reno7 5G
7.17.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy F34vsSamsung Galaxy F23
8.27.1