- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Galaxy F23 vs T909
Samsung Galaxy F23 vs Tel.Me. T909
What Galaxy F23 does better (6) and where T909 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
6.8Display3.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy F23T909
| Galaxy F23 | T909 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 165.5 mm | 109 mm | +56.5 mm |
| Width | 77 mm | 44 mm | +33 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 22 mm | −13.6 mm |
| Weight | 198 g | 95 g | +103 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy F23 better than T909?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 600 mAh8.3×
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
- Thickness8.4 mm vs 22 mm2.6×
- Memory card slotYes · T909: No
- Dual SIMYes · T909: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · T909: No
Why is T909 better than Galaxy F23?
- Weight198 g vs 95 g2.1×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 198 g | 95 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 22 mm |
| Height | 165.5 mm | 109 mm |
| Width | 77 mm | 44 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Aqua Blue, Forest Green | 3 - Silver/ Grey, Grey/Silver, Silver/Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | — |
| Panel | TFT LCD | Monochrome graphic |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 2,408 px | — |
| Pixel density | 400 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.3% | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G | — |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | — |
| Process | 8 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | — |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | — |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | — |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | — |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | — |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | — |
| Optical stabilisation | No | — |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | — |
| Telephoto camera | No | — |
| Max video | 4K | — |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | — |
| 4K selfie video | No | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 600 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 25 W | — |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5 | — |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | — |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | — |
| SAR (head) | 1.24 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | — |
| Platform | Android | — |
| Interface | One UI 6 | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GvsSamsung Galaxy F23
7.27.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy A33 5GvsSamsung Galaxy F23
7.17.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy F54vsSamsung Galaxy F23
8.87.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy F14vsSamsung Galaxy F23
6.77.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy F23vsOPPO Reno7 5G
7.17.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy F34vsSamsung Galaxy F23
8.27.1