- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Galaxy F23 vs Pova Neo 5G
Samsung Galaxy F23 vs Tecno Pova Neo 5G
What Galaxy F23 does better (6) and where Pova Neo 5G wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.8Display6.3
6.4Camera5.1
5.3Battery7.0
7.1Features4.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy F23Pova Neo 5G
| Galaxy F23 | Pova Neo 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 165.5 mm | 170.8 mm | −5.3 mm |
| Width | 77 mm | 77.9 mm | −0.9 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 9.5 mm | −1.1 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy F23 better than Pova Neo 5G?
- RAM6 GB vs 4 GB+50%
- NFCYes · Pova Neo 5G: No
- Wired charging25 W vs 18 W+39%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Pova Neo 5G: No
- Thickness8.4 mm vs 9.5 mm+13%
Why is Pova Neo 5G better than Galaxy F23?
- Stereo speakersNo · Galaxy F23: Yes
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+20%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+9%
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.8″+3%
- Process8 nm vs 6 nm+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 198 g | — |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 9.5 mm |
| Height | 165.5 mm | 170.8 mm |
| Width | 77 mm | 77.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IPX2 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx2 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Aqua Blue, Forest Green | Sprint Blue, Sapphire Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,408 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 400 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.3% | 82.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G | Mediatek Dimensity 810 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | — |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 18 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 1.24 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 6 | HiOS 7.6 |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GvsSamsung Galaxy F23
7.27.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy A33 5GvsSamsung Galaxy F23
7.17.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy F54vsSamsung Galaxy F23
8.87.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy F14vsSamsung Galaxy F23
6.77.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy F23vsOPPO Reno7 5G
7.17.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy F34vsSamsung Galaxy F23
8.27.1