- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Galaxy A72 vs Galaxy M62
Samsung Galaxy A72 vs Samsung Galaxy M62
What Galaxy A72 does better (8) and where Galaxy M62 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.1Display5.2
9.2Camera7.5
5.3Battery8.0
5.9Features5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A72Galaxy M62
| Galaxy A72 | Galaxy M62 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 165 mm | 163.9 mm | +1.1 mm |
| Width | 77.4 mm | 76.3 mm | +1.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 9.5 mm | −1.1 mm |
| Weight | 203 g | 218 g | −15 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A72 better than Galaxy M62?
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 60 Hz+50%
- Optical stabilisationYes · Galaxy M62: No
- Telephoto cameraYes · Galaxy M62: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Galaxy M62: No
- Peak brightness800 nits vs 420 nits+90%
- Weight203 g vs 218 g+7%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Thickness8.4 mm vs 9.5 mm+13%
Why is Galaxy M62 better than Galaxy A72?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 7,000 mAh+40%
- CPU frequency2.3 GHz vs 2.73 GHz+19%
- Process8 nm vs 7 nm+14%
- Screen-to-body ratio84.4% vs 86.7%+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 203 g | 218 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 9.5 mm |
| Height | 165 mm | 163.9 mm |
| Width | 77.4 mm | 76.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP67 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Violet, Awesome Blue | Laser Green, Laser Gray, Laser Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | 420 nits |
| Measured brightness | 825 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.4% | 86.7% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G | Exynos 9825 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Exynos |
| Process | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.3 GHz | 2.73 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Mali-G76 MP12 |
| AnTuTu score | 279,342 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 6,483 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 313 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/1.73" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 3× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 7,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 54% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -26.4 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.23 W/kg | 0.68 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | upgradable to Android 14 One UI 6.1 | One UI 5 |
