- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Galaxy A70 vs Xperia XZ2 compact
Samsung Galaxy A70 vs Sony Xperia XZ2 compact
What Galaxy A70 does better (12) and where Xperia XZ2 compact wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.9Display5.4
5.9Camera4.2
3.3Battery2.3
5.0Features5.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A70Xperia XZ2 compact
| Galaxy A70 | Xperia XZ2 compact | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.3 mm | 135 mm | +29.3 mm |
| Width | 76.7 mm | 65 mm | +11.7 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 12.1 mm | −4.2 mm |
| Weight | 183 g | 168 g | +15 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A70 better than Xperia XZ2 compact?
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 2,870 mAh+57%
- Main camera32 MP vs 19 MP+68%
- RAM6 GB vs 4 GB+50%
- OLED panelYes · Xperia XZ2 compact: No
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Rear cameras3 vs 13×
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 5 MP6.4×
- Screen size6.7″ vs 5″+34%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Dual SIMYes · Xperia XZ2 compact: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Xperia XZ2 compact: No
- Thickness7.9 mm vs 12.1 mm+53%
Why is Xperia XZ2 compact better than Galaxy A70?
- Stereo speakersNo · Galaxy A70: Yes
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz+40%
- Pixel density393 ppi vs 483 ppi+23%
- Weight183 g vs 168 g+9%
- USB version2 vs 3.1+55%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 183 g | 168 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 12.1 mm |
| Height | 164.3 mm | 135 mm |
| Width | 76.7 mm | 65 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP65 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx5 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | White, Black, Blue | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 5″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,160 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 483 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | — |
| Peak brightness | 600 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 604 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86% | — |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 11 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 612 | Adreno 630 |
| AnTuTu score | 480,034 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,672 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 32 MP | 19 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.8" | — |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 5 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 2,870 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 25 W | — |
| Charged in 30 min | 45% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.1 |
| Satellite navigation | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Rear |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | fingerprint | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer, color spectrum, fingerprint |
| SAR (head) | 0.35 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI | — |
