- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Galaxy A53 5G vs T909
Samsung Galaxy A53 5G vs Tel.Me. T909
What Galaxy A53 5G does better (7) and where T909 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
7.4Display3.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A53 5GT909
| Galaxy A53 5G | T909 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 159.6 mm | 109 mm | +50.6 mm |
| Width | 74.8 mm | 44 mm | +30.8 mm |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 22 mm | −13.9 mm |
| Weight | 189 g | 95 g | +94 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A53 5G better than T909?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 600 mAh8.3×
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
- OLED panelYes · T909: No
- Stereo speakersYes · T909: No
- Thickness8.1 mm vs 22 mm2.7×
- Memory card slotYes · T909: No
- Dual SIMYes · T909: No
Why is T909 better than Galaxy A53 5G?
- Weight189 g vs 95 g+99%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 189 g | 95 g |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 22 mm |
| Height | 159.6 mm | 109 mm |
| Width | 74.8 mm | 44 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP67 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Black, White, Blue, Peach | 3 - Silver/ Grey, Grey/Silver, Silver/Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | — |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | Monochrome graphic |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | — |
| Pixel density | 405 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 830 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.4% | — |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Exynos 1280 | — |
| Chip maker | Exynos | — |
| Process | 5 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | — |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | — |
| GPU | Mali-G68 | — |
| AnTuTu score | 329,802 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,891 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 635 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | — |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | — |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | — |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | — |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.72" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | — |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | — |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | — |
| Telephoto camera | No | — |
| Max video | 4K | — |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | — |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 600 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 25 W | — |
| Charged in 30 min | 45% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | — |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | — |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -26.5 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | — |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (market/region dependent) | — |
| SAR (head) | 0.89 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | — |
| Platform | Android | — |
| Interface | One UI 8 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 4 | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A54vsSamsung Galaxy A53 5G
7.57.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy A53 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A34
7.47.5
vs
Samsung Galaxy A53 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A15
7.46.5
vs
Samsung Galaxy A53 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A14
7.45.0
vs
Samsung Galaxy A53 5GvsSamsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
7.49.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy A53 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A14 5G
7.45.9