- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Galaxy A52s 5G vs T909
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G vs Tel.Me. T909
What Galaxy A52s 5G does better (8) and where T909 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
7.4Display3.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A52s 5GT909
| Galaxy A52s 5G | T909 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 159.9 mm | 109 mm | +50.9 mm |
| Width | 75.1 mm | 44 mm | +31.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 22 mm | −13.6 mm |
| Weight | 189 g | 95 g | +94 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A52s 5G better than T909?
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 600 mAh7.5×
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
- OLED panelYes · T909: No
- Stereo speakersYes · T909: No
- Thickness8.4 mm vs 22 mm2.6×
- Memory card slotYes · T909: No
- Dual SIMYes · T909: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · T909: No
Why is T909 better than Galaxy A52s 5G?
- Weight189 g vs 95 g+99%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 189 g | 95 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 22 mm |
| Height | 159.9 mm | 109 mm |
| Width | 75.1 mm | 44 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP67 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Purple, Awesome Mint | 3 - Silver/ Grey, Grey/Silver, Silver/Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | — |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | Monochrome graphic |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | — |
| Pixel density | 405 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 800 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.9% | — |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G | — |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | — |
| Process | 6 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | — |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | — |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | — |
| AnTuTu score | 429,675 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 11,060 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 685 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | — |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | — |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | — |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | — |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.7" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | — |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | — |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | — |
| Telephoto camera | No | — |
| Max video | 4K | — |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | — |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 600 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 25 W | — |
| Charged in 30 min | 53% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5 | — |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | — |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -27.5 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | — |
| SAR (head) | 0.88 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | — |
| Platform | Android | — |
| Interface | One UI 6 | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Apple iPhone 13vsSamsung Galaxy A52s 5G
7.67.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy A05svsSamsung Galaxy A52s 5G
4.87.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A32
7.75.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A04svsSamsung Galaxy A52s 5G
4.47.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy S23vsSamsung Galaxy A52s 5G
8.47.7
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 ProvsSamsung Galaxy A52s 5G
7.47.7