- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Galaxy A52 vs Y50t
Samsung Galaxy A52 vs Vivo Y50t
What Galaxy A52 does better (13) and where Y50t wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.9Display4.1
8.7Camera5.1
3.3Battery3.0
5.9Features3.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A52Y50t
| Galaxy A52 | Y50t | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 159.9 mm | 162 mm | −2.1 mm |
| Width | 75.1 mm | 76.6 mm | −1.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.5 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Weight | 189 g | 190 g | −1 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A52 better than Y50t?
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 60 Hz+50%
- OLED panelYes · Y50t: No
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Y50t: No
- NFCYes · Y50t: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Y50t: No
- Wired charging25 W vs 18 W+39%
- Main camera64 MP vs 48 MP+33%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 8 MP4×
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Y50t: No
- 4K selfie videoYes · Y50t: No
Why is Y50t better than Galaxy A52?
Y50t has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 189 g | 190 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.5 mm |
| Height | 159.9 mm | 162 mm |
| Width | 75.1 mm | 76.6 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP67 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Violet, Awesome Blue | Black, Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 407 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 794 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.1% | 84.4% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.3 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 618 |
| AnTuTu score | 261,282 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 5,865 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 313 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.7" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 50% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -27 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.35 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 6.1 | OriginOS |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A53 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A52
7.46.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy A52vsXiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
6.96.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy A52vsSamsung Galaxy A13
6.94.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A52vsSamsung Galaxy A73 5G
6.98.0
vs
Samsung Galaxy A52vsSamsung Galaxy A33 5G
6.97.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy A52vsSamsung Galaxy A23
6.95.9


