- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Galaxy A52 vs iQOO Z3
Samsung Galaxy A52 vs Vivo iQOO Z3
What Galaxy A52 does better (7) and where iQOO Z3 wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.9Display6.7
8.7Camera7.8
3.2Battery4.9
5.9Features5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A52iQOO Z3
| Galaxy A52 | iQOO Z3 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 159.9 mm | 164 mm | −4.1 mm |
| Width | 75.1 mm | 75.3 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.5 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Weight | 189 g | 186 g | +4 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A52 better than iQOO Z3?
- OLED panelYes · iQOO Z3: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · iQOO Z3: No
- NFCYes · iQOO Z3: No
- Stereo speakersYes · iQOO Z3: No
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 4,400 mAh+2%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
- 4K selfie videoYes · iQOO Z3: No
Why is iQOO Z3 better than Galaxy A52?
- Wired charging25 W vs 55 W2.2×
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- 5GNo · Galaxy A52: Yes
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- CPU frequency2.3 GHz vs 2.8 GHz+22%
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Process8 nm vs 7 nm+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 189 g | 186 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.5 mm |
| Height | 159.9 mm | 164 mm |
| Width | 75.1 mm | 75.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP67 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Violet, Awesome Blue | Ace Black, Cyber Blue, Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,408 px |
| Pixel density | 407 ppi | 401 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 794 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.1% | 84.5% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G | Qualcomm SDM768 Snapdragon 768G 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.3 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 620 |
| AnTuTu score | 261,282 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 5,865 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 313 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/1.97" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,400 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 55 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 50% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -27 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.35 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 6.1 | Funtouch 11.1 (International) |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A53 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A52
7.46.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy A52vsXiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
6.96.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy A52vsSamsung Galaxy A13
6.94.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A52vsSamsung Galaxy A73 5G
6.98.0
vs
Samsung Galaxy A52vsSamsung Galaxy A33 5G
6.97.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy A52vsSamsung Galaxy A23
6.95.9


