- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Galaxy A52 vs Galaxy S24
Samsung Galaxy A52 vs Samsung Galaxy S24
What Galaxy A52 does better (6) and where Galaxy S24 wins (25) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.9Display7.8
4.3Performance8.0
8.7Camera9.2
3.2Battery3.1
5.9Features9.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A52Galaxy S24
| Galaxy A52 | Galaxy S24 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 159.9 mm | 147 mm | +12.9 mm |
| Width | 75.1 mm | 70.6 mm | +4.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 7.6 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Weight | 189 g | 167 g | +22 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A52 better than Galaxy S24?
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 4,000 mAh+12%
- Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 12 MP2.7×
- Memory card slotYes · Galaxy S24: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Galaxy S24: No
- Screen size6.5″ vs 6.2″+5%
Why is Galaxy S24 better than Galaxy A52?
- AnTuTu score261,282 vs 1,218,9774.7×
- Peak brightness800 nits vs 2,600 nits3.2×
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme313 vs 4,18313.4×
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Telephoto cameraNo · Galaxy A52: Yes
- Wireless chargingNo · Galaxy A52: Yes
- 5GNo · Galaxy A52: Yes
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Measured brightness794 nits vs 1,401 nits+76%
- CPU frequency2.3 GHz vs 3.39 GHz+47%
- Process8 nm vs 4 nm2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 189 g | 167 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 7.6 mm |
| Height | 159.9 mm | 147 mm |
| Width | 75.1 mm | 70.6 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP67 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Colours | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Violet, Awesome Blue | Onyx Black, Marble Grey, Cobalt Violet, Amber Yellow, Jade Green, Sandstone Orange, Sapphire Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.2″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 407 ppi | 416 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | 2,600 nits |
| Measured brightness | 794 nits | 1,401 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.1% | 90.9% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G | Qualcomm SM8650-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 - USA/Canada/China |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 8 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.3 GHz | 3.39 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 750 - USA/Canada/China Xclipse 940 - International |
| AnTuTu score | 261,282 | 1,218,977 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 5,865 | 5,833 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 313 | 4,183 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 3× |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 12 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | — | 12.1 h |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 50% | 50% |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 15 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| Video output | — | Yes |
| Ultra Wideband | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -27 LUFS | -25.2 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display, ultrasonic |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| SAR (head) | 0.35 W/kg | 0.87 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 6.1 | One UI 9 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 7 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A53 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A52
7.46.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy A52vsXiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
6.96.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy A52vsSamsung Galaxy A13
6.94.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A52vsSamsung Galaxy A73 5G
6.98.0
vs
Samsung Galaxy A52vsSamsung Galaxy A33 5G
6.97.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy A52vsSamsung Galaxy A23
6.95.9