- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Galaxy A52 vs Galaxy S23
Samsung Galaxy A52 vs Samsung Galaxy S23
What Galaxy A52 does better (7) and where Galaxy S23 wins (23) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.9Display7.8
4.3Performance7.6
8.7Camera9.2
3.2Battery2.9
5.9Features9.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A52Galaxy S23
| Galaxy A52 | Galaxy S23 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 159.9 mm | 146.3 mm | +13.6 mm |
| Width | 75.1 mm | 70.9 mm | +4.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 7.6 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Weight | 189 g | 168 g | +21 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A52 better than Galaxy S23?
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 3,900 mAh+15%
- Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)5,865 vs 4,950+18%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 12 MP2.7×
- Memory card slotYes · Galaxy S23: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Galaxy S23: No
- Screen size6.5″ vs 6.1″+7%
Why is Galaxy S23 better than Galaxy A52?
- AnTuTu score261,282 vs 1,231,0754.7×
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme313 vs 3,66911.7×
- Peak brightness800 nits vs 1,750 nits2.2×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Telephoto cameraNo · Galaxy A52: Yes
- Wireless chargingNo · Galaxy A52: Yes
- 5GNo · Galaxy A52: Yes
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Measured brightness794 nits vs 1,198 nits+51%
- CPU frequency2.3 GHz vs 3.36 GHz+46%
- Process8 nm vs 4 nm2×
- Max video4K vs 8K
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 189 g | 168 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 7.6 mm |
| Height | 159.9 mm | 146.3 mm |
| Width | 75.1 mm | 70.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP67 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Colours | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Violet, Awesome Blue | Phantom Black, Cream, Green, Lavender, Graphite, Lime |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.1″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 407 ppi | 425 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | 1,750 nits |
| Measured brightness | 794 nits | 1,198 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.1% | 86.8% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G | Qualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 8 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.3 GHz | 3.36 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 740 |
| AnTuTu score | 261,282 | 1,231,075 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 5,865 | 4,950 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 313 | 3,669 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 3× |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 12 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 3,900 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | — | 11.4 h |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 50% | 50% |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 15 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| Video output | — | Yes |
| Ultra Wideband | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -27 LUFS | -27 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display, ultrasonic |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| SAR (head) | 0.35 W/kg | 0.96 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 6.1 | One UI 8.5 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A53 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A52
7.46.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy A52vsXiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
6.96.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy A52vsSamsung Galaxy A13
6.94.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A52vsSamsung Galaxy A73 5G
6.98.0
vs
Samsung Galaxy A52vsSamsung Galaxy A33 5G
6.97.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy A52vsSamsung Galaxy A23
6.95.9


