- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Galaxy A32 vs Redmi Note 9
Samsung Galaxy A32 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
What Galaxy A32 does better (11) and where Redmi Note 9 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.0Display3.6
2.6Performance2.2
7.1Camera5.7
4.0Battery5.9
5.0Features5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A32Redmi Note 9
| Galaxy A32 | Redmi Note 9 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 158.9 mm | 162.3 mm | −3.4 mm |
| Width | 73.6 mm | 77.2 mm | −3.6 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.9 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Weight | 184 g | 199 g | −15 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A32 better than Redmi Note 9?
- AnTuTu score286,666 vs 200,414+43%
- Measured brightness814 nits vs 370 nits2.2×
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 60 Hz+50%
- OLED panelYes · Redmi Note 9: No
- RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- Main camera64 MP vs 48 MP+33%
- Peak brightness800 nits vs 450 nits+78%
- Weight184 g vs 199 g+8%
- Pixel density411 ppi vs 395 ppi+4%
- Selfie camera20 MP vs 13 MP+54%
- Thickness8.4 mm vs 8.9 mm+6%
Why is Redmi Note 9 better than Galaxy A32?
- Wired charging15 W vs 18 W+20%
- Charged in 30 min25% vs 38%+52%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 184 g | 199 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 158.9 mm | 162.3 mm |
| Width | 73.6 mm | 77.2 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Blue, Awesome Violet | Forest Green, Midnight Grey, Polar White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 411 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | 450 nits |
| Measured brightness | 814 nits | 370 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.6% | 83.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 286,666 | 200,414 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,277 | 1,292 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 20 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,020 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 25% | 38% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -30.3 LUFS | -30.1 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Rear |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.45 W/kg | 0.8 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 5 | MIUI 13 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A53 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A32
7.45.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A13vsSamsung Galaxy A32
4.85.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A73 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A32
8.05.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A33 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A32
7.15.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A23vsSamsung Galaxy A32
5.95.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A03vsSamsung Galaxy A32
3.95.8


