- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Galaxy A32 vs Bison Pro
Samsung Galaxy A32 vs Umidigi Bison Pro
What Galaxy A32 does better (7) and where Bison Pro wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.0Display4.1
7.1Camera6.3
4.0Battery4.6
5.0Features6.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A32Bison Pro
| Galaxy A32 | Bison Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 158.9 mm | 164 mm | −5.1 mm |
| Width | 73.6 mm | 79.6 mm | −6 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 12.7 mm | −4.3 mm |
| Weight | 184 g | 265 g | −81 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A32 better than Bison Pro?
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 60 Hz+50%
- OLED panelYes · Bison Pro: No
- Main camera64 MP vs 48 MP+33%
- Weight184 g vs 265 g+44%
- Thickness8.4 mm vs 12.7 mm+51%
- Bluetooth5 vs 4.2+19%
- Screen-to-body ratio84.6% vs 74.6%+13%
Why is Bison Pro better than Galaxy A32?
- Wired charging15 W vs 18 W+20%
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Selfie camera20 MP vs 24 MP+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 184 g | 265 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 12.7 mm |
| Height | 158.9 mm | 164 mm |
| Width | 73.6 mm | 79.6 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Colours | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Blue, Awesome Violet | Storm Gray, Hack Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.3″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 411 ppi | 409 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 814 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.6% | 74.6% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 | Mediatek Helio G80 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 286,666 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,277 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 20 MP | 24 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 25% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 4.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -30.3 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometer, thermometer (skin temperature) |
| SAR (head) | 0.45 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 5 | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A53 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A32
7.45.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A13vsSamsung Galaxy A32
4.85.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A73 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A32
8.05.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A33 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A32
7.15.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A23vsSamsung Galaxy A32
5.95.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A03vsSamsung Galaxy A32
3.95.8