- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Galaxy A32 5G vs Blade V30 Vita
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs ZTE Blade V30 Vita
What Galaxy A32 5G does better (10) and where Blade V30 Vita wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.4Display5.0
6.3Camera3.9
4.0Battery5.6
7.1Features3.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A32 5GBlade V30 Vita
| Galaxy A32 5G | Blade V30 Vita | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.2 mm | 173 mm | −8.8 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 78.1 mm | −2 mm |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm | 8.9 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Weight | 205 g | 210 g | −5 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A32 5G better than Blade V30 Vita?
- RAM8 GB vs 3 GB2.7×
- 5GYes · Blade V30 Vita: No
- NFCYes · Blade V30 Vita: No
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 1.6 GHz+25%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Blade V30 Vita: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- Weight205 g vs 210 g+2%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%
- Bluetooth5 vs 4.2+19%
Why is Blade V30 Vita better than Galaxy A32 5G?
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Pixel density270 ppi vs 288 ppi+7%
- Screen size6.5″ vs 6.8″+5%
- Screen-to-body ratio81.6% vs 102%+25%
- Thickness9.1 mm vs 8.9 mm+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 205 g | 210 g |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 164.2 mm | 173 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 78.1 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Blue, Awesome Violet | Black, Blue, Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 1,640 px |
| Pixel density | 270 ppi | 288 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 400 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 497 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81.6% | 102% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 720 | — |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | — |
| Process | 7 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | — |
| AnTuTu score | 226,561 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,673 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 362 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 3 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 15 W | — |
| Charged in 30 min | 23% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 4.2 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28.5 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| SAR (head) | 0.33 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 5 | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A32 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A12
5.24.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy A31vsSamsung Galaxy A32 5G
5.85.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy A32 5GvsInfinix Note 10
5.25.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy A32 5GvsTecno Spark 7 Pro
5.25.0
vs
Samsung Galaxy A32 5GvsXiaomi Redmi Note 10T 5G
5.25.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy A32 5GvsTecno Pova Neo
5.25.3