- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Galaxy A32 5G vs Power 5S
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs Umidigi Power 5S
What Galaxy A32 5G does better (13) and where Power 5S wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.4Display3.5
6.3Camera5.2
4.0Battery6.4
7.1Features3.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A32 5GPower 5S
| Galaxy A32 5G | Power 5S | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.2 mm | 164.8 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 76.9 mm | −0.8 mm |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm | 9.9 mm | −0.8 mm |
| Weight | 205 g | 215 g | −10 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A32 5G better than Power 5S?
- Main camera48 MP vs 16 MP3×
- RAM8 GB vs 4 GB2×
- Wired charging15 W vs 10 W+50%
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- NFCYes · Power 5S: No
- CPU cores8 vs 42×
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 32 GB2×
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- Process7 nm vs 12 nm+71%
- Weight205 g vs 215 g+5%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/2+11%
Why is Power 5S better than Galaxy A32 5G?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,150 mAh+23%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 205 g | 215 g |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm | 9.9 mm |
| Height | 164.2 mm | 164.8 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 76.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Blue, Awesome Violet | Carbon Grey, Jade Green, Sapphire Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 270 ppi | 269 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 400 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 497 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81.6% | 81.2% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 720 | Unisoc Tiger T310 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Unisoc |
| Process | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 4 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | PowerVR GE8300 |
| AnTuTu score | 226,561 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,673 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 362 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 16 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/2 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,150 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 10 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 23% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28.5 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.33 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 5 | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A32 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A12
5.24.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy A31vsSamsung Galaxy A32 5G
5.85.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy A32 5GvsInfinix Note 10
5.25.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy A32 5GvsTecno Spark 7 Pro
5.25.0
vs
Samsung Galaxy A32 5GvsXiaomi Redmi Note 10T 5G
5.25.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy A32 5GvsTecno Pova Neo
5.25.3