- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Galaxy A32 5G vs Armor X8i
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs UleFone Armor X8i
What Galaxy A32 5G does better (17) and where Armor X8i wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.4Display2.7
6.3Camera3.4
4.0Battery4.9
7.1Features6.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A32 5GArmor X8i
| Galaxy A32 5G | Armor X8i | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.2 mm | 160.3 mm | +3.9 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 79 mm | −2.9 mm |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm | 13.8 mm | −4.7 mm |
| Weight | 205 g | 256 g | −51 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A32 5G better than Armor X8i?
- RAM8 GB vs 3 GB2.7×
- Main camera48 MP vs 13 MP3.7×
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 32 GB4×
- Wired charging15 W vs 10 W+50%
- 5GYes · Armor X8i: No
- Weight205 g vs 256 g+25%
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 32 GB2×
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Armor X8i: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- Screen size6.5″ vs 5.7″+14%
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz+11%
Why is Armor X8i better than Galaxy A32 5G?
- Pixel density270 ppi vs 282 ppi+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 205 g | 256 g |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm | 13.8 mm |
| Height | 164.2 mm | 160.3 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 79 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Blue, Awesome Violet | Black, Orange, Red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 5.7″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 1,440 px |
| Pixel density | 270 ppi | 282 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 400 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 497 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81.6% | 66.2% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 720 | Mediatek MT6762D Helio A25 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| AnTuTu score | 226,561 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,673 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 362 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 3 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 32 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 13 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.2 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,080 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 10 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 23% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28.5 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Rear |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.33 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 5 | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A32 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A12
5.24.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy A31vsSamsung Galaxy A32 5G
5.85.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy A32 5GvsInfinix Note 10
5.25.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy A32 5GvsTecno Spark 7 Pro
5.25.0
vs
Samsung Galaxy A32 5GvsXiaomi Redmi Note 10T 5G
5.25.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy A32 5GvsTecno Pova Neo
5.25.3