- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Galaxy A32 5G vs Pova Neo
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs Tecno Pova Neo
What Galaxy A32 5G does better (9) and where Pova Neo wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.4Display3.9
6.3Camera3.4
4.0Battery7.0
7.1Features3.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A32 5GPova Neo
| Galaxy A32 5G | Pova Neo | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.2 mm | 171.4 mm | −7.2 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 77.3 mm | −1.2 mm |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm | 9.1 mm | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A32 5G better than Pova Neo?
- Main camera48 MP vs 13 MP3.7×
- NFCYes · Pova Neo: No
- RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Pova Neo: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- Process7 nm vs 12 nm+71%
- Pixel density270 ppi vs 263 ppi+3%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%
Why is Pova Neo better than Galaxy A32 5G?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+20%
- Wired charging15 W vs 18 W+20%
- Peak brightness400 nits vs 480 nits+20%
- Screen size6.5″ vs 6.8″+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 205 g | — |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm | 9.1 mm |
| Height | 164.2 mm | 171.4 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 77.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Blue, Awesome Violet | Obsidian, Geek blue, Powehi |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 1,640 px |
| Pixel density | 270 ppi | 263 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 400 nits | 480 nits |
| Measured brightness | 497 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81.6% | 82.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 720 | Mediatek MT6762G Helio G25 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| AnTuTu score | 226,561 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,673 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 362 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 13 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 23% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28.5 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Rear |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| SAR (head) | 0.33 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 5 | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A32 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A12
5.24.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy A31vsSamsung Galaxy A32 5G
5.85.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy A32 5GvsInfinix Note 10
5.25.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy A32 5GvsTecno Spark 7 Pro
5.25.0
vs
Samsung Galaxy A32 5GvsXiaomi Redmi Note 10T 5G
5.25.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy A32 5GvsVivo Y21s
5.25.2