- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Galaxy A32 5G vs Camon 18T
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs Tecno Camon 18T
What Galaxy A32 5G does better (8) and where Camon 18T wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.4Display4.8
6.3Camera5.7
4.0Battery4.6
7.1Features2.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A32 5GCamon 18T
| Galaxy A32 5G | Camon 18T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.2 mm | 168.9 mm | −4.7 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 76.7 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm | 8.9 mm | +0.2 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A32 5G better than Camon 18T?
- RAM8 GB vs 4 GB2×
- 5GYes · Camon 18T: No
- NFCYes · Camon 18T: No
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Camon 18T: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- Process7 nm vs 12 nm+71%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
Why is Camon 18T better than Galaxy A32 5G?
- Wired charging15 W vs 18 W+20%
- Pixel density270 ppi vs 395 ppi+46%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 48 MP3.7×
- Peak brightness400 nits vs 500 nits+25%
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Screen size6.5″ vs 6.8″+5%
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
- Screen-to-body ratio81.6% vs 84.8%+4%
- Thickness9.1 mm vs 8.9 mm+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 205 g | — |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 164.2 mm | 168.9 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 76.7 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Blue, Awesome Violet | Iris purple, Dusk Gray, Ceramic White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 270 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 400 nits | 500 nits |
| Measured brightness | 497 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81.6% | 84.8% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 720 | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 226,561 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,673 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 362 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 48 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 23% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | — |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28.5 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| SAR (head) | 0.33 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 5 | HiOS 8.0 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A32 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A12
5.24.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy A31vsSamsung Galaxy A32 5G
5.85.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy A32 5GvsInfinix Note 10
5.25.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy A32 5GvsTecno Spark 7 Pro
5.25.0
vs
Samsung Galaxy A32 5GvsRealme C25
5.25.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy A32 5GvsXiaomi Redmi Note 10T 5G
5.25.2


