- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Galaxy A32 5G vs 20 R 5G
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs TCL 20 R 5G
What Galaxy A32 5G does better (9) and where 20 R 5G wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.4Display4.2
6.3Camera3.4
4.0Battery2.8
7.1Features7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A32 5G20 R 5G
| Galaxy A32 5G | 20 R 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.2 mm | 164.3 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 75 mm | +1.1 mm |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm | 9 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 205 g | 186 g | +19 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A32 5G better than 20 R 5G?
- Main camera48 MP vs 13 MP3.7×
- RAM8 GB vs 4 GB2×
- Wired charging15 W vs 10 W+50%
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+11%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · 20 R 5G: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/2.2+22%
Why is 20 R 5G better than Galaxy A32 5G?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 90 Hz+50%
- Peak brightness400 nits vs 500 nits+25%
- Weight205 g vs 186 g+10%
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+10%
- Bluetooth5 vs 5.2+4%
- Screen-to-body ratio81.6% vs 83.3%+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 205 g | 186 g |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm | 9 mm |
| Height | 164.2 mm | 164.3 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 75 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Blue, Awesome Violet | Gray, Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 270 ppi | 269 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 400 nits | 500 nits |
| Measured brightness | 497 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81.6% | 83.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 720 | Mediatek Dimensity 700 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 226,561 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,673 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 362 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 13 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.2 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/3.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 10 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 23% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28.5 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Rear |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.33 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 5 | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A32 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A12
5.24.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy A31vsSamsung Galaxy A32 5G
5.85.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy A32 5GvsInfinix Note 10
5.25.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy A32 5GvsTecno Spark 7 Pro
5.25.0
vs
Samsung Galaxy A32 5GvsXiaomi Redmi Note 10T 5G
5.25.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy A32 5GvsTecno Pova Neo
5.25.3


