- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Galaxy A24 4G vs F3 Pro
Samsung Galaxy A24 4G vs Umidigi F3 Pro
What Galaxy A24 4G does better (8) and where F3 Pro wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.0Display4.7
7.8Camera6.0
5.3Battery7.3
5.7Features8.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A24 4GF3 Pro
| Galaxy A24 4G | F3 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.1 mm | 165.6 mm | −3.5 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 76.4 mm | +1.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 9.6 mm | −1.3 mm |
| Weight | 195 g | 195 g | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A24 4G better than F3 Pro?
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 60 Hz+50%
- OLED panelYes · F3 Pro: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · F3 Pro: No
- Wired charging25 W vs 18 W+39%
- Main camera50 MP vs 48 MP+4%
- Process6 nm vs 7 nm+17%
- Thickness8.3 mm vs 9.6 mm+16%
- Bluetooth5.3 vs 5.1+4%
Why is F3 Pro better than Galaxy A24 4G?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,150 mAh+23%
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- 5GNo · Galaxy A24 4G: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Galaxy A24 4G: Yes
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 16 MP+23%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 195 g | 195 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 9.6 mm |
| Height | 162.1 mm | 165.6 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 76.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Colours | Black, Lime Green, Blue gradient, Dark red | Starry Black, Matte Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,408 px |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 400 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 1,012 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.4% | 82.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Mediatek Dimensity 700 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 398,005 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,890 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 344 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,150 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 46% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28.9 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.41 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8.5 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 4 | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A53 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A24 4G
7.46.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A24 4GvsInfinix Note 30 Pro
6.87.0
vs
Samsung Galaxy A13vsSamsung Galaxy A24 4G
4.86.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A24 4GvsTecno Camon 20 Pro
6.86.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy A24 4GvsSamsung Galaxy F14
6.86.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy A24 4GvsOnePlus Nord N30
6.87.0


