- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Galaxy A22 5G vs Y76 5G
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G vs Vivo Y76 5G
What Galaxy A22 5G does better (4) and where Y76 5G wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.3Display4.0
5.3Camera5.6
4.0Battery3.9
7.1Features7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A22 5GY76 5G
| Galaxy A22 5G | Y76 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 167.2 mm | 163.8 mm | +3.4 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 75 mm | +1.4 mm |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 7.8 mm | +1.2 mm |
| Weight | 203 g | 175 g | +28 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A22 5G better than Y76 5G?
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 60 Hz+50%
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,100 mAh+22%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Y76 5G: No
Why is Y76 5G better than Galaxy A22 5G?
- Wired charging15 W vs 44 W2.9×
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Charged in 30 min23% vs 66%2.9×
- Main camera48 MP vs 50 MP+4%
- Peak brightness380 nits vs 460 nits+21%
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 16 MP2×
- Weight203 g vs 175 g+16%
- Thickness9 mm vs 7.8 mm+15%
- Screen-to-body ratio82.3% vs 84.9%+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 203 g | 175 g |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 167.2 mm | 163.8 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 75 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colours | Gray, White, Mint, Violet | Cosmic Aurora, Midnight Space |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,408 px |
| Pixel density | 399 ppi | 401 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 380 nits | 460 nits |
| Measured brightness | 385 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.3% | 84.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 | Mediatek Dimensity 700 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 242,155 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 6,913 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 320 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,100 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 44 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 23% | 66% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28.5 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.73 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI core 5 | Funtouch 12 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A12vsSamsung Galaxy A22 5G
4.45.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy A22 5GvsXiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
5.95.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A31vsSamsung Galaxy A22 5G
5.85.9
vs
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A22 5G
6.15.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy A22 5GvsInfinix Note 11 Pro
5.95.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy A22 5GvsHonor 50 Lite
5.96.1