- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Galaxy A22 5G vs iQOO U3x
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G vs Vivo iQOO U3x
What Galaxy A22 5G does better (8) and where iQOO U3x wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.3Display5.5
5.3Camera4.2
4.0Battery4.6
7.1Features5.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A22 5GiQOO U3x
| Galaxy A22 5G | iQOO U3x | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 167.2 mm | 164.2 mm | +3 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 75.4 mm | +1 mm |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 8.4 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Weight | 203 g | 186 g | +18 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A22 5G better than iQOO U3x?
- Main camera48 MP vs 13 MP3.7×
- NFCYes · iQOO U3x: No
- Memory card slotYes · iQOO U3x: No
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · iQOO U3x: No
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz+10%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/2.2+22%
- Process7 nm vs 8 nm+14%
Why is iQOO U3x better than Galaxy A22 5G?
- Wired charging15 W vs 18 W+20%
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- Weight203 g vs 186 g+9%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
- Thickness9 mm vs 8.4 mm+7%
- Screen-to-body ratio82.3% vs 84.2%+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 203 g | 186 g |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 167.2 mm | 164.2 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 75.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Colours | Gray, White, Mint, Violet | Gray, Aurora |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,408 px |
| Pixel density | 399 ppi | 401 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 380 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 385 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.3% | 84.2% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 7 nm | 8 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| AnTuTu score | 242,155 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 6,913 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 320 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 13 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.2 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 23% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28.5 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.73 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI core 5 | OriginOS 1.0 for iQOO |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A12vsSamsung Galaxy A22 5G
4.45.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy A22 5GvsXiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
5.95.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A31vsSamsung Galaxy A22 5G
5.85.9
vs
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A22 5G
6.15.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy A22 5GvsInfinix Note 11 Pro
5.95.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy A22 5GvsHonor 50 Lite
5.96.1