- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Galaxy A22 5G vs Bison Pro
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G vs Umidigi Bison Pro
What Galaxy A22 5G does better (9) and where Bison Pro wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.3Display4.1
5.3Camera6.3
4.0Battery4.6
7.1Features6.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A22 5GBison Pro
| Galaxy A22 5G | Bison Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 167.2 mm | 164 mm | +3.2 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 79.6 mm | −3.2 mm |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 12.7 mm | −3.7 mm |
| Weight | 203 g | 265 g | −62 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A22 5G better than Bison Pro?
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 60 Hz+50%
- 5GYes · Bison Pro: No
- Weight203 g vs 265 g+31%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz+10%
- Process7 nm vs 12 nm+71%
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.3″+5%
- Thickness9 mm vs 12.7 mm+41%
- Bluetooth5 vs 4.2+19%
- Screen-to-body ratio82.3% vs 74.6%+10%
Why is Bison Pro better than Galaxy A22 5G?
- Wired charging15 W vs 18 W+20%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 24 MP3×
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Pixel density399 ppi vs 409 ppi+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 203 g | 265 g |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 12.7 mm |
| Height | 167.2 mm | 164 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 79.6 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Colours | Gray, White, Mint, Violet | Storm Gray, Hack Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.3″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 399 ppi | 409 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 380 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 385 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.3% | 74.6% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 | Mediatek Helio G80 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 242,155 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 6,913 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 320 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 24 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 23% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 4.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28.5 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometer, thermometer (skin temperature) |
| SAR (head) | 0.73 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI core 5 | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A12vsSamsung Galaxy A22 5G
4.45.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy A22 5GvsXiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
5.95.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A31vsSamsung Galaxy A22 5G
5.85.9
vs
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A22 5G
6.15.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy A22 5GvsInfinix Note 11 Pro
5.95.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy A22 5GvsHonor 50 Lite
5.96.1