- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Galaxy A22 5G vs Pova Neo
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G vs Tecno Pova Neo
What Galaxy A22 5G does better (10) and where Pova Neo wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.3Display3.9
5.3Camera3.4
4.0Battery7.0
7.1Features3.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A22 5GPova Neo
| Galaxy A22 5G | Pova Neo | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 167.2 mm | 171.4 mm | −4.2 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 77.3 mm | −0.9 mm |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 9.1 mm | −0.1 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A22 5G better than Pova Neo?
- Main camera48 MP vs 13 MP3.7×
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 60 Hz+50%
- NFCYes · Pova Neo: No
- RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- Pixel density399 ppi vs 263 ppi+52%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Pova Neo: No
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz+10%
- Process7 nm vs 12 nm+71%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 720 px+50%
Why is Pova Neo better than Galaxy A22 5G?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+20%
- Wired charging15 W vs 18 W+20%
- Peak brightness380 nits vs 480 nits+26%
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.8″+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 203 g | — |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 9.1 mm |
| Height | 167.2 mm | 171.4 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 77.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colours | Gray, White, Mint, Violet | Obsidian, Geek blue, Powehi |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 1,640 px |
| Pixel density | 399 ppi | 263 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 380 nits | 480 nits |
| Measured brightness | 385 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.3% | 82.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 | Mediatek MT6762G Helio G25 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| AnTuTu score | 242,155 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 6,913 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 320 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 13 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 23% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28.5 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Rear |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| SAR (head) | 0.73 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI core 5 | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A12vsSamsung Galaxy A22 5G
4.45.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy A22 5GvsXiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
5.95.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A31vsSamsung Galaxy A22 5G
5.85.9
vs
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A22 5G
6.15.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy A22 5GvsInfinix Note 11 Pro
5.95.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy A22 5GvsHonor 50 Lite
5.96.1