dotrising.com
Compare
Galaxy A17 4G vs RugKing

Samsung Galaxy A17 4G vs UleFone RugKing

What Galaxy A17 4G does better (17) and where RugKing wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Samsung · 2025Galaxy A17 4G

7.0Score

17 advantages≈ $170

Higher score

UleFone · 2025RugKing

6.4Score

7 advantages≈ $180

7.0Display3.8

7.8Camera4.6

5.3Battery7.8

5.7Features6.0

Dimensions

Size comparison

Galaxy A17 4GRugKing

	Galaxy A17 4G	RugKing	Difference
Height	164.4 mm	173.4 mm	−9 mm
Width	77.9 mm	83.4 mm	−5.5 mm
Thickness	7.5 mm	18.3 mm	−10.8 mm
Weight	190 g	397 g	−207 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Galaxy A17 4G better than RugKing?

Weight190 g vs 397 g2.1×
Refresh rate90 Hz vs 60 Hz+50%
OLED panelYes · RugKing: No
Optical stabilisationYes · RugKing: No
Wired charging25 W vs 18 W+39%
Pixel density385 ppi vs 269 ppi+43%
Thickness7.5 mm vs 18.3 mm2.4×
Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
Rear cameras2 vs 12×
Ultra-wide cameraYes · RugKing: No
Screen size6.7″ vs 6″+12%
CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz+10%

Why is RugKing better than Galaxy A17 4G?

Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 9,600 mAh+92%
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
Endurance per cycle52 h vs 106 h2.1×
Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Galaxy A17 4G: Yes
Drop resistance classB vs A
Peak brightness800 nits vs 910 nits+14%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Samsung Galaxy A17 4G≈ $1707.0	UleFone RugKing≈ $1806.4
Design
Weight	190 g	397 g
Thickness	7.5 mm	18.3 mm
Height	164.4 mm	173.4 mm
Width	77.9 mm	83.4 mm
Frame	Plastic	—
Back	Plastic	—
Ingress protection	IP54	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx4	IPx8
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+	Corning Gorilla Glass 3
Colours	Black, Gray, Light blue	Black
Display
Screen size	6.7″	6″
Panel	Super AMOLED	IPS LCD
OLED panel	Yes	No
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	720 px
Resolution (height)	2,340 px	1,440 px
Pixel density	385 ppi	269 ppi
Refresh rate	90 Hz	60 Hz
Peak brightness	800 nits	910 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	86%	64%
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Helio G99	Unisoc T7255
Chip maker	MediaTek	Unisoc
Process	6 nm	12 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.2 GHz	2 GHz
GPU	Mali-G57 MC2	Mali-G57
AnTuTu score	526,972	—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	2,052	—
Memory
RAM	8 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	256 GB
Storage type	—	UFS 2.2
Memory card slot	Yes	Yes
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.8
Main sensor size	1/2.76"	1/2.76"
Rear cameras	2	1
Optical stabilisation	Yes	No
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	No
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	1080p	1080p
Selfie camera	13 MP	8 MP
4K selfie video	No	No
Battery
Battery capacity	5,000 mAh	9,600 mAh
Battery type	Li-Ion	—
Wired charging	25 W	18 W
Charged in 30 min	44%	—
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
5G	No	No
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5	Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth	5.3	5
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakers	No	No
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	Yes
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Side
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)	0.37 W/kg	—
Software
OS at launch	Android 15	Android 15
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	One UI 7	—
Major OS updates promised	6	—
EU label
Energy class	A	A
Battery charge cycles	1,200	1,000
Endurance per cycle	52 h	106 h
Repairability class	C	C
Drop resistance class	B	A