- dotrising.com
- Compare
- V11 5G vs Galaxy A32 5G
Realme V11 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
What V11 5G does better (7) and where Galaxy A32 5G wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.4Display2.4
5.6Camera6.3
4.6Battery4.0
5.0Features7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
V11 5GGalaxy A32 5G
| V11 5G | Galaxy A32 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.9 mm | 164.2 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Width | 75.7 mm | 76.1 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 9.1 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Weight | 186 g | 205 g | −19 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is V11 5G better than Galaxy A32 5G?
- Wired charging18 W vs 15 W+20%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- Weight186 g vs 205 g+10%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz+10%
- Thickness8.4 mm vs 9.1 mm+8%
- Screen-to-body ratio85.5% vs 81.6%+5%
Why is Galaxy A32 5G better than V11 5G?
- Main camera13 MP vs 48 MP3.7×
- NFCNo · V11 5G: Yes
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Memory card slotNo · V11 5G: Yes
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · V11 5G: Yes
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 13 MP+62%
- Main camera aperturef/2.2 vs f/1.8+22%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 186 g | 205 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 9.1 mm |
| Height | 163.9 mm | 164.2 mm |
| Width | 75.7 mm | 76.1 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black, Blue | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Blue, Awesome Violet |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | TFT LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 270 ppi | 270 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 400 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 497 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.5% | 81.6% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 | Mediatek Dimensity 720 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC3 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 226,561 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,673 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 362 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 13 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2.2 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 15 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 23% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -28.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.33 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 5 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A32 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A12
5.24.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy A31vsSamsung Galaxy A32 5G
5.85.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy A32 5GvsInfinix Note 10
5.25.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy A32 5GvsTecno Spark 7 Pro
5.25.0
vs
Samsung Galaxy A32 5GvsXiaomi Redmi Note 10T 5G
5.25.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy A32 5GvsTecno Pova Neo
5.25.3


