- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Narzo 50 Pro vs Redmi K40S
Realme Narzo 50 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi K40S
What Narzo 50 Pro does better (5) and where Redmi K40S wins (13) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.2Display7.9
6.0Camera8.0
6.0Battery5.5
6.7Features6.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Narzo 50 ProRedmi K40S
| Narzo 50 Pro | Redmi K40S | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 160.2 mm | 163.2 mm | −3 mm |
| Width | 73.3 mm | 76 mm | −2.7 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 7.7 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Weight | 181 g | 195 g | −14 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Narzo 50 Pro better than Redmi K40S?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+11%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Redmi K40S: No
- Weight181 g vs 195 g+8%
- Pixel density411 ppi vs 395 ppi+4%
- Process6 nm vs 7 nm+17%
Why is Redmi K40S better than Narzo 50 Pro?
- Wired charging33 W vs 67 W2×
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · Narzo 50 Pro: Yes
- NFCNo · Narzo 50 Pro: Yes
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+28%
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- Screen size6.4″ vs 6.7″+4%
- Charged in 30 min48% vs 79%+65%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 20 MP+25%
- Thickness8 mm vs 7.7 mm+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 181 g | 195 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 7.7 mm |
| Height | 160.2 mm | 163.2 mm |
| Width | 73.3 mm | 76 mm |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Hyper Blue, Hyper Black | Black, Gray, Blue, Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 411 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,300 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.2% | 86.6% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 920 | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 650 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 48% | 79% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | realme UI 3 | MIUI 13 |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 ProvsRealme Narzo 50 Pro
7.47.2
vs
Vivo V23 5GvsRealme Narzo 50 Pro
7.47.2
vs
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5GvsRealme Narzo 50 Pro
7.27.2
vs
Realme Narzo 50 ProvsInfinix Zero 5G 2023
7.27.2
vs
Realme Narzo 70 ProvsRealme Narzo 50 Pro
8.17.2
vs
Realme Narzo 60 ProvsRealme Narzo 50 Pro
8.57.2


