- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Narzo 50 Pro vs Pova 4 Pro
Realme Narzo 50 Pro vs Tecno Pova 4 Pro
What Narzo 50 Pro does better (9) and where Pova 4 Pro wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.2Display6.3
6.0Camera4.6
6.0Battery8.3
6.7Features5.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Narzo 50 ProPova 4 Pro
| Narzo 50 Pro | Pova 4 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 160.2 mm | 164.8 mm | −4.6 mm |
| Width | 73.3 mm | 77 mm | −3.7 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 9.2 mm | −1.2 mm |
| Weight | 181 g | 211 g | −30 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Narzo 50 Pro better than Pova 4 Pro?
- 5GYes · Pova 4 Pro: No
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Pova 4 Pro: No
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 8 MP2×
- Weight181 g vs 211 g+17%
- CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+14%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 4+50%
- Thickness8 mm vs 9.2 mm+15%
- Bluetooth5.2 vs 5+4%
Why is Pova 4 Pro better than Narzo 50 Pro?
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- NFCNo · Narzo 50 Pro: Yes
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+20%
- Wired charging33 W vs 45 W+36%
- Main camera48 MP vs 50 MP+4%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Screen size6.4″ vs 6.7″+4%
- Charged in 30 min48% vs 62%+29%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 181 g | 211 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 9.2 mm |
| Height | 160.2 mm | 164.8 mm |
| Width | 73.3 mm | 77 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Hyper Blue, Hyper Black | Fluorite Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 411 ppi | 403 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 450 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.2% | 83% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 920 | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 556,518 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,047 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 346 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 48% | 62% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | realme UI 3 | HiOS 8.6 |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 ProvsRealme Narzo 50 Pro
7.47.2
vs
Vivo V23 5GvsRealme Narzo 50 Pro
7.47.2
vs
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5GvsRealme Narzo 50 Pro
7.27.2
vs
Realme Narzo 50 ProvsInfinix Zero 5G 2023
7.27.2
vs
Realme Narzo 70 ProvsRealme Narzo 50 Pro
8.17.2
vs
Realme Narzo 60 ProvsRealme Narzo 50 Pro
8.47.2


