- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Narzo 30 5G vs Redmi Note 9S
Realme Narzo 30 5G vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S
What Narzo 30 5G does better (7) and where Redmi Note 9S wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.2Display4.2
5.0Camera6.5
4.6Battery5.9
5.0Features3.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Narzo 30 5GRedmi Note 9S
| Narzo 30 5G | Redmi Note 9S | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.5 mm | 165.8 mm | −3.3 mm |
| Width | 74.8 mm | 76.7 mm | −1.9 mm |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 8.8 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Weight | 185 g | 209 g | −24 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Narzo 30 5G better than Redmi Note 9S?
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 60 Hz+50%
- 5GYes · Redmi Note 9S: No
- Peak brightness600 nits vs 450 nits+33%
- Weight185 g vs 209 g+13%
- Pixel density405 ppi vs 395 ppi+3%
- Process7 nm vs 8 nm+14%
- Thickness8.5 mm vs 8.8 mm+4%
Why is Redmi Note 9S better than Narzo 30 5G?
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Narzo 30 5G: Yes
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz+5%
- Screen size6.5″ vs 6.7″+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 185 g | 209 g |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 8.8 mm |
| Height | 162.5 mm | 165.8 mm |
| Width | 74.8 mm | 76.7 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Racing Blue, Racing Silver | Aurora Blue, Glacier White, Interstellar Gray |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 405 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 600 nits | 450 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 575 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.9% | 84.5% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 7 nm | 8 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 618 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 254,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,785 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 314 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,020 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 30% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| NFC | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -27.8 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.72 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | realme UI 2.0 | MIUI 14 |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Mi 11 LitevsRealme Narzo 30 5G
5.85.8
vs
Realme Narzo 50vsRealme Narzo 30 5G
6.25.8
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10SvsXiaomi Redmi Note 9S
6.45.0
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9SvsXiaomi Redmi Note 9
5.04.9
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11SvsXiaomi Redmi Note 9S
6.35.0
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9SvsInfinix Note 7
5.05.0

