- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Narzo 30 5G vs Galaxy M21 2021
Realme Narzo 30 5G vs Samsung Galaxy M21 2021
What Narzo 30 5G does better (8) and where Galaxy M21 2021 wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.2Display5.0
5.0Camera6.7
4.6Battery6.6
5.0Features5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Narzo 30 5GGalaxy M21 2021
| Narzo 30 5G | Galaxy M21 2021 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.5 mm | 159 mm | +3.5 mm |
| Width | 74.8 mm | 75.1 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 9 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Weight | 185 g | 192 g | −7 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Narzo 30 5G better than Galaxy M21 2021?
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 60 Hz+50%
- 5GYes · Galaxy M21 2021: No
- Wired charging18 W vs 15 W+20%
- Peak brightness600 nits vs 420 nits+43%
- Weight185 g vs 192 g+4%
- Process7 nm vs 10 nm+43%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/2+11%
- Thickness8.5 mm vs 9 mm+6%
Why is Galaxy M21 2021 better than Narzo 30 5G?
- OLED panelNo · Narzo 30 5G: Yes
- NFCNo · Narzo 30 5G: Yes
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+20%
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Narzo 30 5G: Yes
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz+5%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 20 MP+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 185 g | 192 g |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 9 mm |
| Height | 162.5 mm | 159 mm |
| Width | 74.8 mm | 75.1 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colours | Racing Blue, Racing Silver | Charcoal Black, Arctic Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.4″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 405 ppi | 403 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 600 nits | 420 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.9% | 84.2% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 | Exynos 9611 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Exynos |
| Process | 7 nm | 10 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/2 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 15 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Rear |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.47 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | realme UI 2.0 | One UI 3.1 Core |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Mi 11 LitevsRealme Narzo 30 5G
5.85.8
vs
Realme Narzo 50vsRealme Narzo 30 5G
6.25.8
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10SvsSamsung Galaxy M21 2021
6.46.5
vs
Samsung Galaxy M21 2021vsXiaomi Redmi Note 11 (China)
6.56.5
vs
Samsung Galaxy M21 2021vsOPPO A95 5G
6.56.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy M21 2021vsTel.Me. T909