- dotrising.com
- Compare
- C85 vs XP Pro Thermal
Realme C85 vs Sonim XP Pro Thermal
What C85 does better (7) and where XP Pro Thermal wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.3Display5.5
4.6Camera6.1
8.8Battery7.3
7.6Features7.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
C85XP Pro Thermal
| C85 | XP Pro Thermal | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166.1 mm | 171.5 mm | −5.4 mm |
| Width | 77.9 mm | 80 mm | −2.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 11.5 mm | −3.1 mm |
| Weight | 215 g | 267 g | −52 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is C85 better than XP Pro Thermal?
- Battery capacity7,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+40%
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 90 Hz+60%
- Weight215 g vs 267 g+24%
- Dual SIMYes · XP Pro Thermal: No
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.6″+3%
- Thickness8.4 mm vs 11.5 mm+37%
- Screen-to-body ratio87.4% vs 76%+15%
Why is XP Pro Thermal better than C85?
- Wireless chargingNo · C85: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · C85: Yes
- Pixel density254 ppi vs 401 ppi+58%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 16 MP2×
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.63 GHz+10%
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 215 g | 267 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 11.5 mm |
| Height | 166.1 mm | 171.5 mm |
| Width | 77.9 mm | 80 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Colours | Green, Purple | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,570 px | 2,408 px |
| Pixel density | 254 ppi | 401 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,200 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.4% | 76% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 | Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.63 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 720 |
| AnTuTu score | 522,460 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,015 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.96" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | — |
| Wired charging | 45 W | — |
| Charged in 30 min | 50% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Realme UI 6.0 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 2 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | C |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 41 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | A |
