How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Compare
  3. PSP 500 vs Blade A36

Peaq PSP 500 vs ZTE Blade A36

What PSP 500 does better (1) and where Blade A36 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Peaq PSP 500
Peaq · 2025PSP 500
1 advantage≈ $170
vs
ZTE Blade A36
ZTE · 2025Blade A36
4.5Score
3 advantages≈ $140
Higher score
3.7Camera2.7

Why is PSP 500 better than Blade A36?

  1. Selfie camera8 MP vs 5 MP+60%

Why is Blade A36 better than PSP 500?

  1. Screen size5″ vs 6.8″+35%
  2. Dual SIMNo · PSP 500: Yes
  3. Resolution (width)480 px vs 720 px+50%
Specifications

Side by side

Peaq PSP 500Peaq PSP 500≈ $170
ZTE Blade A36ZTE Blade A36≈ $1404.5
Design
Weight—193 g
Thickness—8.3 mm
Height—167.6 mm
Width—77.4 mm
Frame—Plastic
Back—Plastic
Ingress protection—IP54
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx4
ColoursBlackBlack, Green, Silver
Display
Screen size5″6.8″
Panel—IPS LCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (width)480 px720 px
Resolution (height)960 px1,600 px
Pixel density—260 ppi
Refresh rate—90 Hz
Peak brightness—500 nits
Screen-to-body ratio—84.8%
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio P22Unisoc T7200
Chip makerMediatekUnisoc
Process—12 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency—1.6 GHz
GPUPowerVR GE8320Mali-G57 MP1
Memory
RAM4 GB4 GB
Storage (max)64 GB64 GB
Storage (base)64 GB64 GB
Storage type—eMMC 5.1
Memory card slotYesYes
Camera
Main camera13 MP13 MP
Rear cameras11
Optical stabilisationNoNo
Ultra-wide cameraNoNo
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Max video—1080p
Selfie camera8 MP5 MP
4K selfie video—No
Battery
Battery capacity—5,000 mAh
Battery typeLi-Po—
Wired charging—10 W
Wireless charging—No
Connectivity
5GNoNo
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMNoYes
Wi-Fi standard—Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth—5.2
NFC—No
USB—USB Type-C 2.0
USB version—2
Satellite navigation—GLONASS, GALILEO
Features
Stereo speakers—No
3.5 mm headphone jack—Yes
Sensors—Accelerometer, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launch—Android 15
Platform—Android
EU label
Energy class—A
Battery charge cycles—800
Endurance per cycle—54 h
Repairability class—B
Drop resistance class—D
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare